StandardBots - Lead Functional Safety Engineer

• You've taken collaborative robots, or machinery of similar complexity, through third-party safety assessment — and you can tell us what went wrong. • You work fluently in ISO 10218-1 and -2, ISO 13849-1 and -2, ISO 12100 and IEC 61508, and you have an opinion on the 2025 revision of ISO 10218. • You can read a schematic and a firmware architecture well enough to challenge the engineers who wrote them. • You know the full toolkit (FMEA, FTA, HAZOP, STPA, SISTEMA) and which one to reach for. • You'd rather be on the test floor with a robot and a force gauge than in a document review. • You know the difference between what the standard requires and what actually makes the robot safe, and you deliver both. • For the Lead seat: you've led or mentored safety engineers, or you're ready to build a team for the first time. • You don't need to tick every box. If you're close — at any level — apply anyway. We'd rather meet you. • You've worked on the assessor side, at a notified body or NRTL. • You know mobile manipulators and AMRs: ANSI/RIA R15.08, ISO 3691-4. • You've built or specified a safety controller rather than bought one. • You've shipped at a startup and liked it.